Resolution by Leaders of Academy Research Network

A resolution by the Board of Directors of the Academy Research Centres regarding the necessary law amendment to transform the structure and financing of the research, development and the innovation system has been passed unanimously by the Board, apart from two abstentions.*


Resolution by the Board of Directors of the Academy Research Centres regarding the necessary law amendment to transform the structure and financing of the research, development and the innovation system.


The recommended law amendments do not correspond with the agreements previously reached between the Ministry for Innovation and Technology and the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, nor with the German research network models which were cited many times by the ministry.


The recommended law amendments are clearly unconstitutional. Namely, they violate article XIII, which deals with property rights. According to the proposed law amendments, the property and estates of the Academy are to be freely and obligatorily leased for an indefinite period of time, lacking compensation or a relevant contract.

The recommended law amendments do not guarantee the future basic funding of the research centres and without basic funding the centres will not be able to function as scientific research facilities.


According to the recommended law amendments, the sitting prime minister would not only appoint the president of the board presiding over the research network, but also individual members. This solution would not guarantee the true parity of the board, which is professionally indispensable when it comes to conducting scientific work. The amendments do not guarantee that the delegates of the research institutes will be members of the board.

Contrary to earlier agreements, the recommended law amendments do not guarantee a fixed time period for the research network, and any kind of planned reorganisation can be passed by a simple majority of the Board instead of a qualified majority.


We find it alarming that the amendment does not specify that directors be appointed according to the current standards of an open tender procedure as well as by a qualified majority of the board.


Considering that the minister responsible would appoint the financial manager of the secretariat of the research network, the new governing structure calls the autonomy of the research network into question.


The law amendments effectively provide for complete governmental and political control over the research network, which stands in stark contrast to the German model continuously cited by the ministry. This endeavour, together with the proposed structure of the National Science Policy Council and the increased role of the minister within the council, potentially jeopardises the independence of scientific research and science, which is otherwise guaranteed in the constitution.